Hello world!

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, At accusam aliquyam diam diam dolore dolores duo eirmod eos erat, et nonumy sed tempor et et invidunt justo labore Stet clita ea et gubergren, kasd magna no rebum. sanctus sea sed takimata ut vero voluptua. est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, At accusam aliquyam diam diam dolore dolores duo eirmod eos erat, et nonumy sed tempor et et invidunt justo labore Stet clita ea et gubergren, kasd magna no rebum. sanctus sea sed takimata ut vero voluptua. est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis.

Hello world!

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, At accusam aliquyam diam diam dolore dolores duo eirmod eos erat, et nonumy sed tempor et et invidunt justo labore Stet clita ea et gubergren, kasd magna no rebum. sanctus sea sed takimata ut vero voluptua. est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, At accusam aliquyam diam diam dolore dolores duo eirmod eos erat, et nonumy sed tempor et et invidunt justo labore Stet clita ea et gubergren, kasd magna no rebum. sanctus sea sed takimata ut vero voluptua. est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat.

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis.

Our Children Deserve Better

by Kim Williams
On July 16, with a group of friends I took an early morning stroll into a wetlands area in the city of Chesapeake, Virginia. We arrived before sunrise, but though the area was beautiful, we were not there for the views. The wetlands were overrun by heavy equipment and stacks of 24-inch diameter pipeline.
My friends and I were on a mission: to occupy the construction equipment.
Why would we want to do such a thing? We were there to protect children.
The construction equipment was being used to build the Southside Connector, a 9-mile-long Virginia Natural Gas utility pipeline. And there the giant diggers and pounders and pipe sat, perilously close to a cheerful building named for the late civil rights attorney and first African-American Supreme Court Justice, the “Thurgood Marshall Elementary School.” Shockingly close. A stone’s throw.
My friends and I made public the external costs of this pipeline, which is slated to end along the Elizabeth River in Chesapeake right, next to the planned end of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline in Hampton Roads. We hung banners reading “Methane Gas Pipeline = Blast Zone Danger + Climate Disaster” and “Our Children Deserve Better.”
We occupied the tops of two large construction vehicles, and settled in to watch the sunrise. I had time to calm myself, meditate. The sunrise was so beautiful, birdsong joyful. What a wonderful learning lab this strip of wetlands could be for this school! If only we didn’t have to contemplate apocalypse!

And that is why I was there. Sitting for two hours atop the pipe-pounder,  I flashed back to happy days as parent-volunteer at my own sons’ schools, my era as reading-tutor, and my time supporting elementary school Spring Carnivals. The memories helped me see beautiful faces, smiles with baby-teeth, lost teeth, teeth growing-in; I could see hair combed in braids and beads, innocence.
But then I could see flames. I could hear glass breaking, bookbags and limbs, flying. And at this school, the faces my mind saw were mostly African-American kindergarteners through fifth graders, innocents. Mostly African-American, because that is where this pipeline is going. In Norfolk, it travels through mostly poor African-American enclaves. In Chesapeake, it cuts though mostly middle-class African-American enclaves. Enclaves because Jim Crow history made it that way.
Workers showed up about 7am. Soon after, the police.
The police were informed by a volunteer liaison that a “stop-work occupy” was underway. Some of us climbed down at that point. I stayed. My kids are self-sufficient. My worklife flexible. My partner supportive. I refused to leave, intending no pipeline construction to happen that day. I now have a court date for a trespass charge. I hope I can make it clear to the judge that Virginia Natural Gas (and it’s Boss Company, Dominion) are the real trespassers in that wetlands next to a school.
Kim Williams is a full-time member of the Norfolk Catholic Worker community.
 

CCAN Statement: Swayed by Virginia DEQ, State Water Control Board Wrongly Allows Controversial Fracked-Gas Pipelines to Proceed, Despite Evidence of Harm to Water Quality

The SWCB Failed to Require Individual Reviews of Pipelines’ Impact, Putting Virginia’s Waters at Risk for Pipelines that Have Already Caused Numerous Violations

RICHMOND, VA — Today, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality provided misleading and incomplete information to the Virginia State Water Control Board during its review of whether the US Army Corps of Engineers’ Nationwide Permit 12 (NWP 12) for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Mountain Valley Pipeline is sufficient to protect Virginia’s water quality. The Board failed to take its opportunity to revoke this permit, instead calling on the DEQ to aggressively enforce the erosion and stormwater controls for the pipelines and respond to complaints promptly.
The Department of Environmental Quality, headed by the controversial David Paylor, continued to strongly recommend that the Board allow pipeline construction to proceed, despite mounting evidence that MVP and ACP have already harmed water quality.
Anne Havemann, General Counsel for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, issued the following statement in response:

“The pipeline companies have cut corners and aggressively pushed for approval before complete information about the impacts were understood. Reviewing federal courts have thrown out key permits for both pipelines, finding that agencies failed to adequately protect endangered species, national forests, and treasured places such as the Blue Ridge Parkway. These invalidated permits were so critical that FERC has halted construction on both pipelines.

“David Paylor’s DEQ likewise pushed for approval from the State Water Control Board before the impacts of the pipelines were understood — the agency recommended approval before critical pollution mitigation plans were in place. Today was the Board’s opportunity to hit pause on construction and require the agency to fully account for impacts to Virginia’s waters — a desperately needed pause for the landowners whose drinking water, streams, and property are threatened by these pipelines. We’re sorely disappointed that the Board passed up this critical opportunity.

“Instead of requiring an individual review, the Board instead called on DEQ to conduct aggressive compliance efforts. While we are still reviewing the Board’s decision it appears to have no teeth, and could allow sediment to continue to be dumped into the water with impunity. In the midst of public outcry and ongoing harm to water quality, we cannot applaud a decision that merely requires the DEQ do the job it should have been doing all along.

“Today is a shameful day for David Paylor’s Department of Environmental Quality, and a sad day for Virginians. But, the fight is not over. We will continue taking these pipelines to court. We are confident that the federal courts will continue to overturn the insufficient permits for these pipelines, and evidence will prove once and for all that these pipelines should never be built.”

Background Information
The Mountain Valley Pipeline has been issued six notices of violation for failing to prevent erosion and sediment from damaging streams. Five notices were issued by the West Virginia DEQ and one by Virginia’s DEQ, which addressed six separate areas of concern. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which is not yet under construction in Virginia, has been issued one notice of violation for tree-felling in buffer zones meant to protect stream and wetland crossings. Additionally, the citizen monitoring group Mountain Valley Watch has submitted 58 reports of suspected improper erosion controls at Southwest Virginia construction sites to the DEQ.
The majority of comments submitted concerning this permit (9,100 of 17,000) urged the Board to reject the Army Corps’ “blanket” permit, and to conduct individual stream crossing reviews instead. According to an analysis conducted by Wild Virginia and the Dominion Pipeline Monitoring Coalition, 815 of the comments submitted were unique, 695 of which were opposed to the permit or the pipelines in general. The comments in opposition also provided far more detailed information than the comments in support.
DEQ even misrepresented the public opposition to the projects.  An analysis of the comments by Wild Virginia and the Dominion Pipeline Monitoring Coalition found that a majority of commenters questioned whether the Army Corps’ nationwide permit was sufficient, with 9,141 opposing and 8,318 in support. The DEQ presented a much different number: Only 4,582 opposed and 8,086 in support.  The discrepancy can be explained by the fact that DEQ disregarded all petitions, though it did not disregard form letters. This decision skewed the result in favor of the NWP 12. This approach is unsupportable. If form documents that express no unique opinions and provide no unique information are to be counted individually, then petition signatures should also have been counted.
This hearing came at an opportune time, as a federal appeals court has revoked key permits for both the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and Mountain Valley Pipeline, leading the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to order a halt to all new construction activity for both pipelines.
CCAN is involved in a lawsuit challenging FERC’s certificate of public convenience and necessity for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and the Mountain Valley Pipeline, and efforts to  challenge the Army Corps’ permit for the pipelines.
CONTACT:
Denise Robbins, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, denise@chesapeakeclimate.org, 608-620-8810
Anne Havemann, General Counsel, 202-997-2466, anne@chesapeakeclimate.org,
Jamshid Bakhtiari, Virginia Field Coordinator, 757-386-8107, jamshid@chesapeakeclimate.org

###

Potomac Pipeline: MD enviros announce legal action

Governor Hogan’s Dangerous Potomac Pipeline Cleared Important Regulatory Hurdle — Groups Fight Back

Chesapeake Climate Action Network and Potomac Riverkeeper Network Request Rehearing of Federal Approval of TransCanada’s Proposed Fracked-Gas Pipeline Underneath the Potomac River

WASHINGTON, DC — Today, environmental groups requested a rehearing for a key permit that was recently issued for a highly controversial fracked-gas pipeline known as the “Potomac Pipeline.” This pipeline is set to be built underneath the Potomac River, threatening the drinking water of millions of residents who rely on the Potomac as a drinking water source.
The permit, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), was called into question by two FERC commissioners who raised concerns about the agency’s examination of the pipeline’s impacts on climate change. Commissioner LaFleur also voiced concerns  about the impacts from a closely related pipeline under construction in West Virginia.  These are among the issues the groups raised in their rehearing request.
From the very beginning, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan put his thumb on the scale in favor of building this pipeline. He coordinated with the Canadian-based company behind the project, TransCanada (which owns Columbia Gas), to exempt the risky drilling process for this pipeline from state oversight. Hogan’s Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) then failed to carry out a thorough water certification process under the Clean Water Act, under which the department would have had the authority to reject the pipeline.
The Potomac Pipeline would run through sensitive karst geology underneath the Potomac River, making it more likely that a leak or explosion could happen during and after construction. It would also deepen our dependence on fossil fuels and lead to an expansion of fracking in Pennsylvania. Fracking wells leak the powerful greenhouse gas methane into the air, making it as bad or worse for global warming than coal.
Anne Havemann, General Counsel at the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, issued the following statement:

“Governor Hogan has been working relentlessly to expand fracked-gas infrastructure throughout the state of Maryland. Now, the Trump Administration has given Hogan what he wanted: A greenlight to build a fracked-gas pipeline underneath the invaluable Potomac River, endangering the water supply of millions of residents and locking us into a new source of fossil fuels for decades.

“Hogan has shirked his responsibility to protect the people of Maryland or listen to their concerns. And now the federal commissioners at FERC have failed the people of America by refusing to examine the climate impacts of the Potomac Pipeline. Even two FERC commissioners know this pipeline could be a disaster for the climate.

“We are committed to taking any and all opportunities to protect our communities from the dangers of this pipeline and all other future pipelines to come.”

Katlyn Schmitt, Staff Attorney at Waterkeepers Chesapeake, stated:

“We are incredibly disappointed by FERC’s failure to adequately consider the cumulative water quality impacts from drilling a fracked gas pipeline under the Potomac River. Ultimately this decision could endanger the area’s largest drinking water supply and local ecosystems that are critical to the Chesapeake Bay.”

More information about the Potomac Pipeline and Governor Hogan’s plan to expand fracked-gas infrastructure in Maryland is available here.

CONTACT:
Denise Robbins, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, denise@chesapeakeclimate.org, 608-620-8810
Katlyn Clark, Waterkeepers Chesapeake, katlyn@waterkeeperschesapeake.org, 240-320-7711
Brent Walls, Upper Potomac Riverkeeper, Brent@upperpotomacriverkeeper.org, 443-480-8970
 

On tape: Wind and solar leaders plead for MD legislation

MD Wind and Solar Businesses Appeal to Lawmakers and Grassroots to Expand Renewable Portfolio Standard

Leaders say two environmental nonprofits are outliers and calls to end RPS could hurt wind and solar employees

ANNAPOLIS, MD — This week, top leaders in The Maryland wind and solar industries called on state legislators and grassroots activists to embrace a bill that would rapidly expand Maryland’s renewable electricity standard.
The leaders — Andrew Gohn of the American Wind Energy Association and Cyrus Tashakkori of the Maryland Utility-Scale Solar Energy Coalition —  pointed to the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) as the key to success for Maryland’s wind and solar industries thus far. They explained that expanding the RPS further would lead to continued expansion of the wind and solar industries, creating thousands of new jobs in Maryland.

Listen to the conference call recording in full here.

There is broad consensus that the RPS incentivizes construction of new wind and solar plants. However, two recent reports from Food & Water Watch (FWW) and Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility (CPSR) have contradicted this broad consensus.
During the conference call, Gohn and Tashakkori explained how these outlier reports used outdated information to come to the wrong conclusions. For instance, the CPSR report continually references data from 2016 to claim that 46 percent of the energy incentivized by the RPS is “brown” energy, or energy from burning black liquor or trash. But in 2020, the RPS will incentivize 80 percent carbon-free energy, with only 20 percent going to “brown” sources. And by doubling the RPS through the Clean Energy Jobs Act, this makeup will be 94 percent clean by 2030.
They also explain why the criticism of “unbundled” Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) is misguided. “There’s a mountain of evidence that RECs incentivize renewables,” Gohn said on the call, pointing to independent analyses from the Brattle Group as well as from national labs like Lawrence Berkeley.  “Just about everybody agrees that RPS policies have been the thing that has driven new renewables in the region.” Tashakkori referenced an analogy he also made in a recent Baltimore Sun op-ed:
“RECs help efficiently manage renewable supply and demand across our region in the same way banks enable us to deposit $20 at one branch and withdraw it at another. It’s a different $20 bill, but that’s irrelevant; we still have $20. CPSR’s critique of unbundled RECs is analogous to insisting that the $20 bill we withdrew be identical to the one we deposited across town, a pointless and inefficient system with hugely negative implications for ratepayers.”

Listen to the conference call recording in full here.

The Clean Energy Jobs Act calls for Maryland’s RPS to increase to 50% by 2030, and provides a path for Maryland to achieve a future powered by 100% clean energy. Read more about it here.
CONTACT:
Denise Robbins, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, denise@chesapeakeclimate.org, 608-620-8810
Andrew Gohn,  Eastern State Policy Director, American Wind Energy Association, agohn@awea.org, 202-809-7044
Cyrus Tashakkori, Board Member, Mid-Atlantic Renewable Energy Coalition,  cyrus@openroadrenewables.com, 512-921-8643
 

###

Environmental Groups Win Victory in Reducing Coal Plant Water Pollution in MD

In Response to Arguments from Advocates and Concerned Citizens, Hogan Administration Limits Toxic Metals from Three Coal-fired Power Plants

Baltimore – Responding to legal and technical arguments from environmental groups and concerned citizens, Maryland Governor Larry Hogan’s Administration has imposed limits on toxic metals in water pollution from three of the state’s largest coal-fired power plants.

These pollutants – including arsenic, mercury and selenium — cause cancer and neurological damage, and are toxic to fish, at very low doses. The new limits at the Chalk Point power plant in Prince George’s County, Dickerson plant in Montgomery County, and Morgantown plant in Charles County could reduce toxic discharges by up to 97 percent in some cases.

“We are pleased to see that the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) is following the law and stepping up to protect the environment at a time when the EPA is actively trying to undermine environmental protection” said Abel Russ, attorney with the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP).

EIP learned about the MDE decision on the Morgantown plant in a letter the advocacy group received yesterday, and about the other two plants late last week, although though the new state permits became effective on July 27.

EIP and the Sierra Club, joined by the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility, Clean Water Action, and the Patuxent and Potomac Riverkeepers, argued in comments sent to MDE last October that EPA’s Clean Water Act regulations compel Maryland to meet new federal limits on toxic metals in wastewater from air pollution scrubbers by November 1, 2020. The groups also presented a technical analysis by a leading expert on coal plant pollution showing that the new limits could be met quickly and affordably.

In the final permits, MDE agreed with the public comments, and imposed the new limits with a 2020 deadline. “The final determination requires compliance with federal EPA effluent limitation guidelines for…wastewater by Nov. 1, 2020,” the MDE letter to EIP states.

The facilities must also cease discharging any water that been mixed with (and used to transport) a power plant waste product called “bottom ash” byNovember 1, 2020, and must report on their progress toward meeting both standards every six months.

“This is yet another step, among many left to go, in order to bring under some level of control and accountability for the egregious environmental impacts these plants have inflicted on their neighbors, and the surrounding air, water and land for years,” said Fred Tutman, the Patuxent Riverkeeper.

Dean Naujoks, the Potomac Riverkeeper, said: “We’re happy that MDE adopted many of the additional restrictions we pushed for. Strengthening these permits to eliminate toxic discharges of heavy metals is a positive step in the right direction but this certainly does not eliminate all the pollution threats these dirty coal fired power plants impose on Maryland communities and the Potomac River.”

Emily Ranson, Maryland Program Coordinator for Clean Water Action, said: “Marylanders are drinking from and fishing in waterways downstream of power plants, and these waterways should not be dumping grounds for power plants’ toxic waste.  Industry should be held accountable for its pollution. Marylanders should not subsidize polluting power plants by suffering the negative health impacts or paying higher water treatment costs to clean up their mess.”

The 2015 EPA standards were the first time that EPA had placed national limits on toxic metals in coal plant discharges, even though coal plants are the nation’s largest industrial source of toxic water pollution.

The decision by the Hogan Administration to limit this pollution cuts against the grain of the Trump Administration, which has been working to delay and roll back the new standards. In 2017 EPA announced a two-year extension of compliance deadlines while it works on a more permanent rollback.

The permits for the Chalk Point, Dickerson, and Morgantown plants were the subject of intense public interest in September and October of 2017 when MDE held a written comment period and public hearings on the subject.  Fifty state lawmakers wrote a letter to Governor Hogan urging action on the issue.

Anne Havemann, General Counsel, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, said: “There’s no debate that toxic metals in our state’s waterways are harmful. Some of the pollutants now discharged by the Morgantown, Dickerson, and Chalk Point can cause cancer risks in humans, lowered IQ among children, and deformities and reproductive harm in fish and wildlife. We applaud the Maryland Department of Environment for taking steps in the absence of federal leadership to protect Marylanders from this extremely harmful toxic pollution.”

The state also made an additional improvement to the Dickerson permit in response to comments from the environmental groups and downstream drinking water utilities that argued  the plant should have to monitor for the pollutant bromide.

Bromide is associated with cancer-causing byproducts in drinking water and is very difficult to treat. MDE required monthly monitoring for bromide and also prohibited the use of any bromine-containing additives at the plant.

The Environmental Integrity Project is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that empowers communities and protects public health and the environment by investigating polluters, holding them accountable under the law, and strengthening public policy.

Media contact: Tom Pelton, Environmental Integrity Project, tpelton@environmentalintegrity.org or (443) 510-2574

###

 

50+ leaders urge Northam to oppose ACP and MVP pipelines

Fifty-four Virginia Organizations Call on Gov. Northam to Visit “Miracle Ridge,” Pristine Forest in Path of Atlantic Coast Pipeline, and Oppose Pipelines

Leaders from environmental advocacy, justice, and business organizations send letter to Northam one week ahead of key State Water Control Board hearings on the controversial pipelines

RICHMOND, VA – Today, 54 Virginia organizations and businesses sent a letter to Governor Ralph Northam asking him to visit the land and communities at risk from the Atlantic Coast Pipeline for fracked gas, and to oppose the highly controversial Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines.
The letter, signed by 54 Virginia organizations — including the Virginia State Conference NAACP, Virginia Student Environmental Coalition, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, and many more — asks Northam to visit the property of Bill and Lynn Limpert at “Miracle Ridge” in Bath County. Their property, filled with hundreds of centuries-old trees, sits in the right-of-way of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The ridge would need to be leveled by the equivalent of a two-story building to build the pipeline. The signers asks Northam to see for himself what’s at stake in the construction of the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley Pipelines for fracked gas.

READ THE LETTER IN FULL HERE.

“Miracle Ridge has been designated by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation as one of the finest oak-hickory forests they have ever seen in all of Virginia,” said Joan Maloof, Executive Director of the Old-Growth Forest Network. “It is imperative that Governor Northam and the Virginia State Water Control Board visit this land first-hand to fully appreciate the magnitude of devastation that the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would have on this old-growth forest.”
The Limperts have been hosting a summer-long “encampment” on their property in Bath County dedicated to stopping Dominion Energy’s proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. This pipeline is slated to go right through their property, destroying hundreds of old-growth trees — some as old as 300 years — and decapitating much of the 3000-foot-long ridge known as “Miracle Ridge.”
“Our property is a natural treasure, and we wish to preserve it for future generations,” said Bill Limpert, landowner at Miracle Ridge. “There are countless other properties in the cross hairs of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline that are treasures as well. We wish to draw Governor Northam’s attention to these lands which should be preserved under his own criteria for protection of high quality natural resources. We hope that the Governor can join us on our property and visit other properties as well that would be lost to the unneeded and destructive Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
The signers also ask Northam to direct the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to require an individual review of the 1,000 water crossings  these pipelines will cross. The DEQ has the authority to do so under section 401 of the Clean Water Act, but it has instead relied on a “blanket” permit from the Army Corps of Engineers that approved crossings for all waterways.
“As a pediatrician, I know that every child needs clean water, clean air, and a safe and stable climate to be healthy and thrive,” said Samantha Adhoot, Chairperson of the Virginia Clinicians for Climate Action. “This pipeline threatens the health and safety of all children in Virginia, particularly those living in communities directly affected by large scale environmental destruction for pipeline infrastructure.  We should not be sacrificing the health of Virginia’s families, children and natural heritage for the sake of corporate profits.”
This letter comes amid setbacks for both the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and the Mountain Valley Pipeline. Last week, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit threw out two key permits for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The same court revoked a different permit from the U.S. Forest Service for the Mountain Valley Pipeline. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued stop-work orders for both the Mountain Valley Pipeline and the Atlantic Coast Pipeline until their respective multiple permit issues are resolved.
Reverend Kevin Chandler, Branch President of the Virginia Conference NAACP, stated: “Currently, both Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley Pipelines are steeped in regulatory challenges. Due to the adverse impacts of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline on African-American communities, particularly in Buckingham County and the Georgetown community in Chesapeake, all construction activities along the route of the pipeline should cease immediately.”
During his campaign for governor, Northam pledged to look at the scientific evidence and use a transparent process to ensure that Virginia’s environment would be fully protected from any pipelines. He also called for site-specific permitting for every water crossing of these pipelines, instead of blanket permits.
One week from today, the Virginia State Water Control Board (SWCB) will hold a hearing on the pipelines. This is the first SWCB meeting since the opening of a comment period re-examining the ability of the Nationwide Permit 12 to provide sufficient protections for Virginia waterways threatened and currently being impacted by the Mountain Valley and Atlantic Coast Pipelines.
“Governor Northam must see first-hand what is at stake for the people whose lives are being so profoundly harmed by work already been done for these pipelines and the threats that loom over them,” said David Sligh, Conservation Director, Wild Virginia. “He can’t possibly see the forests and waters in Little Valley and what Dominion wants to do there and think the science supports it or that Virginia citizens are being treated fairly. He has pledged to be guided by those principles.”
Kendyl Crawford, Director of Virginia Interfaith Power and Light, stated: “As communities of faith, it is our duty to be conscientious stewards of our planet and treat all of creation, including members of the human family, with respect and dignity. Miracle Ridge and the Limperts stand to be part of the sacrifice zone of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Within minutes of visiting their land one is immediately struck by the immense immorality of fossil fuel infrastructure that destroys so much in its wake.”
Jamshid Bakhtiari, Virginia Field Coordinator of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, stated: “Together, the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley Pipelines threaten to chain Virginians to another generation of dangerous and unnecessary fracked-gas fossil fuel extraction. Additionally, the construction of these pipelines threatens numerous endangered species, ridgelines, waterways and vulnerable communities across the Commonwealth. Governor Northam and the Water Control Board need to bear witness to the unconscionable sacrifices Virginians are being asked to make for pipelines that aren’t needed.”
More than 13,000 people submitted public comments concerning this permit, with environmental advocates arguing that it was not intended for projects with the breadth and scale of the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines.

READ THE LETTER IN FULL HERE.

###

CONTACT:
Denise Robbins, Communications Director, denise@chesapeakeclimate.org, 608-620-8819
Jamshid Bakhtiari, Virginia Field Coordinator, jamshid@chesapeakeclimate.org, 757-386-8107
 

“Flood of Voices” Block Party brings Activists and Community Together to Spread Awareness about Climate Change and Sea Level Rise in Hampton Roads Region

Innovative gathering bring music, art, and education to community to call for climate action, urge Virginia leaders to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative

NEWPORT NEWS, VA – Today, environmental advocacy groups hosted a first-of-its-kind block party in King Lincoln Park aimed at spreading awareness about sea level rise and climate change. Residents from the Hampton Roads region joined for a fun party where art, music, and games were creatively used to tell the story of how climate change impacts the region.
“As the current EPA and Presidential administrations push back on historic accomplishments made by those who have done the work before us,” said BeKura W. Shabazz First Alliance Consulting Group & Field Organizer, Federal Climate Action State Lead, Virginia Conservation Network, “we continue to forage forward fighting to protect those environmental protections that we have come to realize encompass more than just nature, we must stay the course and strong by uniting through the commonalities that make us human.”
Hampton Roads is the second-most populated area in the United States vulnerable to sea level rise. Flooding is predicted to increase six more inches by the year 2030. This means six more inches of water on the roads when it rains, causing far more neighborhoods to enter the floodplain.
“The disparity between environmental justice and social justice diminishes with every event, like the Flood of Voices Block Party, that is held in the community,” said Kiquanda Baker, Hampton Roads Organizer, Chesapeake Climate Action Network. “It’s past time we make the connection that environmental injustices affect minority communities the most. Remember, when we fight for the environment, we fight for ourselves.”
“Flood of Voices” is a storytelling series created to amplify the voices of those directly affected by flooding and rising tides, especially those whose voices aren’t normally heard. Our most vulnerable communities are among the first to experience the effects from climate change, and too often, the last to know what they can do about it. Ranging from coal dust pollution to coastal flooding, these communities are left to deal with the impacts of climate change simply because they are not given the chance to take preventative action. Flood of Voices hopes to not only amplify the voices of the unheard but also to educate our communities on how to take action.
“The effects of environmental racism throughout the years has contributed to the decline in mental health, public safety, and economic opportunity in communities of color,” said said LaTonya Wallace, community activist and field manager for Virginia Civic Engagement Table. “Poor air, water, and land quality in these communities have led to many learning and comprehension disabilities leading to students doing poorly in school. It can also increase the occurrences of natural disasters such as nuisance flooding, heavily polluted air, and land subsidence which can deter businesses from wanting to start up in heavily polluted communities of color which leads to weak, unstable economies. It’s time to take action.”
Virginia now has the opportunity to make major moves on climate while accessing millions of dollars in funding for coastal adaptation to protect our communities. By joining the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a multi-state cap-and-trade program, Virginia could unlock crucial funds for adaptation measures throughout Virginia while guaranteeing long-term reductions in carbon emissions in a way that is proven cost-effective. Read more about RGGI here.
“We need to work together with our leaders to make decisions that are beneficial for everyone,” said said Ann Creasy, Hampton Roads Outreach Coordinator, Chesapeake Bay Group Sierra Club. “Community members can promote and hold their elected officials accountable on environmental issues by joining programs such as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). Encourage your local governments to make decisions that put us on the path to one hundred percent clean energy by 2050.”
The Flood of Voices Block Party aimed to spread awareness to the local community on the climate change issues that impact Hampton Roads and local neighborhoods. From fossil fuel pollution to sea level rise, attendees danced, sang, and otherwise artistically expressed their concerns on climate change impacts.
The event was coordinated by the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Mothers Out Front Hampton Roads, Virginia Interfaith Power & Light, York River Group Sierra Club, First Alliance Consulting LLC, Virginia League of Conservation Voters, Chesapeake Bay Group Sierra Club, and the Virginia Conservation Network.
CONTACT:
Denise Robbins, Communications Director, denise@chesapeakeclimate.org; 608-620-8819
Quan Baker, Hampton Roads Coordinator, quan@chesapeakeclimate.org, 757-918-0588

###

Photo Contest: Summer of #ClimateHope

Calling all photography enthusiasts!

In celebration of summer, we’re kicking off a photo contest and we’re hoping to hear from YOU! Do you have beautiful images you’d like to share with our community and the world? Do you want to showcase a visual story about climate change, the environment and community? What do you treasure about where you live? Why are YOU hopeful for the future?
Send in an image for your chance to win prizes and recognition within our member community and on the web. Prizes will include gift cards to local DC businesses. The three winners will also get the chance to guest write a blog post or take part in an interview, telling the story of their image. It’s a great way to connect with our community and share your perspective on your climate home.
Photos should feature the following:

  • Environmental themes: Did you help protect our natural resources? Participate in a rally for a carbon price? Get your community involved in a solar project? Start a neighborhood garden? Lobby your legislator environmental justice? Show us how you are working on environmental issues.
  • The natural beauty of the Chesapeake region: We’re lucky that DC, Virginia, and Maryland are so filled with nature! Showcase yourself with your favorite city/nature hotspot! Tell us in the description how it helps  refresh yourself.
  • Anything you treasure at risk from climate change: From your favorite bee to your cousin’s nephew, what do you cherish and want to protect from climate change? Show us why it is so important to act on climate change where you live.

Entering our photo contest is free and easy. Simply choose to submit via Instagram or email, following the instructions below. Email info@carbonpricedc.org with the subject line “Photo Contest” with any questions.

  • Google form: http://bit.ly/photo-contest-form
  • By email: Send your photo and a description with the subject line “Photo Contest Submission” to info@chesapeakeclimate.org
  • Act Fast! The contest is only open until early September (date to be determined soon).
  • Follow all instructions under the Rules and Guidelines below.

Winners will be announced by early September and publicized in our communications and social media throughout the rest of summer and fall. Winners will be notified by email. Make sure your email is included when you submit your entry.
Prizes will be awarded to the Grand Prize winner and three finalists. The prizes will be gift cards to local businesses who support carbon pricing and climate action. The Grand Prize is $40 to ANXO Cidery and Pintxos Bar, and the runner-up prizes will receive gift certificates ranging from $18 to $25 to other DC businesses.
*By entering the  Photo Contest, you are agreeing to the rules and guidelines of the Photo Contest (below).

  • To be eligible to enter, you must be 18 years or older.
  • Limit five submissions per member.
  • Each participant in the Photo Contest (each a “Participant”) is responsible for ensuring that he or she has the right to submit.
  • Submit large, high resolution images in color or black and white.
  • Only original photos taken by the person or featuring the person submitting are eligible; others will be disqualified.
  • Only digital entries are eligible and must be submitted electronically. You may submit scans of slides or paper prints.

By sharing your photograph with the Chesapeake Climate Action Network (CCAN), you agree to the following:

  • If the photo(s) you share with this group is of someone other than you or something not on your or public property, you have obtained permission and/or have the ability and authority to submit such photo(s) for display on CCAN’s website as described above, and you agree that the images do not infringe on any third party’s rights.
  • No payment will be made to you for CCAN’s display of the photos taken of or submitted by you.
  • If your photo is selected as a finalist, you hereby grant CCAN permission to display the photograph you submit along with your name in promotions of the Photo Contest on the CCAN website, other publications, Facebook updates, Twitter content, and in member emails.
  • By entering the Photo Contest, participants agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CCAN, its respective subsidiaries, affiliates, attorneys, agents and representatives, from any and all third party liability for any injuries, loss, claim, action, demand or damage of any kind arising from or in connection with the competition (collectively, “Losses”), including without limitation any third party claim for copyright infringement or a violation of an individual’s right to privacy and/or publicity right. The Photo Contest is void where prohibited by law.
  • CCAN is not responsible for any incorrect or inaccurate information, whether caused by website users or by any equipment or programming associated with or utilized in the photo competition, or by any technical or human error that may occur in the processing of submissions to the photo competition, including but not limited to any misprints or typographical errors. CCAN assumes no responsibility for any error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorized access to, or alteration of, entries. CCAN is not responsible for any problems or technical malfunction of any telephone network or lines, computer equipment, servers, providers, computer on-line systems, software, or failure of email on account of technical problems or traffic congestion on the Internet or at any website, including injury or damage to participant’s or to any other person’s computer related to or resulting from participating or uploading images or information in the photo contest.
  • If, for any reason, the photo competition is not capable of completion as planned, including but not limited to, any reason of infection by computer virus, bugs, tampering, unauthorized intervention, fraud, technical failures or any other causes beyond the control of CCAN that corrupt or affect the administration, security, fairness, integrity or proper conduct of the photo competition, CCAN reserves the right at their sole discretion to cancel, terminate, modify or suspend the photo competition.

 
Photo at the top by Alexa Gaul on Unsplash
Alexa Gaul